three post-industrial cities – 1/pittsburgh

(This is the first part of three successive entries about Pittsburgh, Cleveland, and Detroit – the first three cities I’ve visited on this trip. All three faced similar problems with post-industrial decay, and all three have responded differently and achieved different results.)

IMG_2335

Despite knowing that Pittsburgh is an Appalachian city, it never occurred to me that it was a city of hills. Or more accurately, it’s a city of hills and rivers and bridges. Approaching from the southeast along the Monongahela River, the city revealed itself dramatically; the approaching driver (myself ) crosses a series of tunnels bored through the Pennsylvania mountains. The tunnels give way to steel bridges and suddenly Pittsburgh appears from behind a hill and you see the skyline, but also the confluence of three rivers that give Pittsburgh its unique geographical qualities. Here, the Allegheny and Monongahela Rivers converge and become the Ohio River, which later merges with the Mississippi, many, many miles downstream. The convergence is geographically critical to Pittsburgh’s history and identity, first as an ideal place for an industrial city to grow, and later as a focal point for the city’s post-industrial transformation.

Despite being ignorant of Pittsburgh’s topography, I had known about Pittsburgh’s recent awakening from post-industrial slumber. I knew that Pittsburgh successfully pulled itself away from its decaying industrial past and shifted its economy toward tourism and technology, while also dedicating itself to improving the infrastructure of its waterfront. I knew that during the recent recession, Pittsburgh was one of the only cities to have its economy grow. And after visiting it, I think I better understand why Pittsburgh’s renaissance has been so successful where other post-industrial cities are still floundering. There were essentially three moves or qualities that I felt contributed to this.

IMG_2288 IMG_2291 IMG_2295

First, Pittsburgh wisely chose to focus on its waterfront as a physical manifestation of rebirth. New stadiums were built on the North Shore, taking advantage of striking views. My very first activity in the city was to watch a baseball game at PNC Park, which uses the downtown skyline as an outfield backdrop to great effect. The ballpark itself is similar to other new ballparks built in the Camden Yards era, with open concourses, intimate views, and richly textured details. The key to PNC Park is its location, both with respect to views from the seats themselves as well as its proximity to the downtown district and the new riverfront walkway. It was exciting to see that, after the Sunday afternoon game, many fans spilled out of the stadium and onto the walkway, strolling up and down like tourists. The walkway itself is extensive, open, and has active uses attached to it. Play fountains, boat hookups, food festivals – I saw all of these and more when I walked up and down the walkway. It’s a vibrant space, and has great connections to both sides of the river, its buildings, and its cultural institutions (museums, sports venues, entertainment, etc.)

IMG_2367

On the promontory known locally as “The Point,” a new park has been designed, with a massive water fountain marking the triangle where the two rivers converge and become the Ohio. The fact that this important geographic area and valuable real estate was set aside not for corporate use but for public space is great, even though I’m not a huge fan of using traditional fountains as markers for public gathering. In this case, however, it works. People sit all around it, and it’s visible from the entire waterfront.

The main downtown waterfront isn’t the only one that’s received redevelopment attention. The South Side Flats district, despite becoming somewhat gentrified, is also an area of cultural significance. Not quite as touristy as the downtown riverfront, the South Side is a nice active area of restaurants, bars, and new housing that has attracted many of the younger people who’ve chosen to move to Pittsburgh.

The second quality that Pittsburgh has chosen to exploit is its educational resources. I stayed in the university district, and it was clear that it is a thriving and active neighborhood. Pittsburgh has smartly made sure that its universities are encouraged to grow, attracting professional and academic development and research when other post-industrial cities have suffered a brain drain in recent decades.

IMG_2304

The third observed quality is Pittsburgh’s manageable size. It takes no more than 20 minutes to drive from one end of the city to the other. Its major districts are well connected despite being separated by three rivers. The city has over 400 bridges, none of which charge any sort of toll or fee, so there’s no obstacle to move quickly and easily between neighborhoods by car.  And all the diverse and varied neighborhoods of Pittsburgh are not too spread out or very large. Presumably this is aided by the city’s topography… there is literally no means to achieve horizontal sprawl with so many hills.

 Speaking of Pittsburgh’s neighborhoods, I found a similarity here to Baltimore, where I lived for five years in the early 1990s. Like Baltimore, Pittsburgh has a wealth of small, diverse neighborhoods that are close together and have fuzzy borders. It was often hard to tell which neighborhood I was in at the time, or where the borders between districts actually began or ended. Sometimes, I’d be driving through a visibly sketchy neighborhood only to find myself out of it in a manner of minutes. So, if there are areas that are less gentrified, less developed, and more poorly maintained, these areas are small. It’s reasonable to assume that their close proximity to other thriving neighborhoods will have a contagious effect inevitably. I could be wrong.

 I think these three factors have contributed strongly towards Pittsburgh’s unusual success. Capitalizing on the city’s geographical aesthetics, its educational and social resources, and its finely grained neighborhood-level diversity and compactness have made it a city well worth learning from, and it’s no wonder that Pittsburgh has become the poster child for post-industrial urban recovery and renewal.

have degree, will travel

Some explanation may be required.

If you’re reading this message, it’s probably because I asked you to. If I asked you to, then it’s probably because I know you well enough. If I know you well enough, it’s probably because you’re at least a little bit interested in what I’m doing and where I’m going. If you’re interested in what I’m doing and where I’m going, then you probably won’t mind a little bit of explanation about what this blog is all about. So let me tell you.

As most you of know, I’m a professional architect and non-professional urbanist. I teach for a living, but I also like to teach for free. I was born in India, grew up in the United States and began my career there, and then moved to India in 2009. I returned to the USA in 2012 in order to pursue a Master’s Degree in Architecture History and Theory. That’s what I’ve spent the last year doing and now that’s done. During this past year, I’ve been doing a bit of research in architecture and urbanism, specifically the relationship that Americans have with cities and suburbs. I won’t go into a long history lesson here, but the focus of my interest has been to discover why people choose to live in – or outside of – cities. As a professed city-lover who has also lived in the suburbs, I’ve been trying to reconcile my own personal faith in the dense urban life of the sort glamorized by Jane Jacobs in the 1960’s with the inarguable desire for people to live away from cities, in private enclaves, separated by lawns and driveways and swimming pools.

I’m not a fan of suburban sprawl. I feel the suburbs – with their parking lots, shopping centers, strip malls, and chain restaurants are monotonous, lifeless, and reflect the easy, least-common-denominator lifestyle of modern American society. But that’s my personal prejudice and I own up to it. Clearly not everyone feels this way, and I understand many of the reasons why they do. But I feel that deeper understanding is in order. I spent the last year reading books and writing papers about these issues, and dove into them like a true academic. But ask any of my former students and they’ll tell you that I encourage learning-by-doing, and I can’t absolve myself of the same responsibility to better understand that which I disagree with by experiencing it in person.

So, I decided to travel the USA. Starting on August 31, 2013, I will be traveling the American landscape and roadscape for six weeks, visiting friends and relatives, but more importantly (for my research, anyway), visiting cities and suburbs and vast stretches of empty land and trying to better understand why people choose to live the way they do, in the places where they do. I’ll be documenting my observations and revelations in this blog, sharing what I see and experience with anyone who’s interested. I’ll be driving the whole way, stopping at places both planned and unplanned, following an itinerary both fixed and flexible.

I’m not entirely sure what I’ll find; the trip may reaffirm or contradict the things I already know in the academic sense. I’ve taken many road trips in my life already, so traveling by car over long distances is no new thing. But this is the first time I’m doing it with some “academic” purpose in mind. Some of what I find will supplement the things I learned from previous road trips; some things will contradict them.

I should also warn you (and this may be redundant for many of you), that once I get started in explaining things, I have a hard time stopping. This first post is a great example; it probably should have ended five paragraphs ago. I apologize in advance if, at best, this blog bores you or, at worst, it becomes a flood of narcissistic navel-gazing ramblings from the mind of a pedant. If any of that happens, well… you can do what most democracies in the world still allow you to do: change the channel. If you stick around, though, I hope you’ll comment and share your opinions and, by all means, express your discontent and disagreement. I won’t mind at all.

I think that’s enough explaining for now. There’s plenty more to come.